For mobile, landscape view is recommended.
Ongoing assessment of former fire/crash sites at Department of Defense (DoD) installations has identified concentrations of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), and other per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in groundwater well above (in some cases, several orders of magnitude above) established health advisory levels. Given the physicochemical properties of PFAS and the fact that they are often comingled with other chemicals, remediation of PFAS-impacted water best lends itself to a treatment train approach with integrated PFAS concentration and destructive steps. Since PFAS plumes are generally dilute (often a few parts per billion), reliable approaches that concentrate PFAS and co-occurring chemicals for subsequent destruction are needed.
The overall objective of this project is to demonstrate and validate an integrated treatment approach using nanofiltration to concentrate PFAS and co-occurring chemical-impacted water and electrical discharge plasma to treat the concentrate derived from nanofiltration. A separate laboratory evaluation will be conducted using the nanofiltration concentrate from the selected field site to provide an “apples to apples” comparison of treatment efficiency and operational costs for another promising destructive technology - electrochemical oxidation – to electrical discharge plasma. Finally, life cycle costs of nanofiltration + plasma (treatment train), plasma, and electrochemical oxidation will be calculated.
The project team plans to use an integrated approach that incorporates well-established and novel water treatment technologies to treat PFAS and co-occurring chemicals in groundwater. Applying current capacities of these technologies for one day (8-hr) can accomplish the following:
Key features include:
The planned technology offers the DoD a cost-effective and reliable alternative to on-site PFAS treatment using conventional technologies (e.g., granular activated carbon [GAC] and ion exchange) and costly off-site disposal options (e.g., incineration; $4-10/gallon). Specifically, nanofiltration has been shown to be less energy intensive than other membrane technologies, and closed-circuit desalination-nanofiltration allows for high recovery not achievable by conventional nanofiltration systems. Plasma offers substantial cost savings relative to GAC and off-site incineration and, unlike sorptive technologies, it generates no waste, limiting future liability. A critical aim for this project is to calculate life cycle costs for operation of nanofiltration + plasma (treatment train), plasma, and electrochemical oxidation. This will be achieved through monitoring of operational data (e.g., energy usage; flowrate; consumables, equipment replacement costs) during testing of the integrated nanofiltration-plasma system and direct comparison of plasma and electrochemical oxidation under similar operating conditions. This will provide the DoD with solid costs for long-term operation of these systems for various PFAS-impacted water sources. (Anticipated project completion - 2024)